Choosing the best way for urinary decompression and developing a novel predictive model for septic shock using SOFA in these patients.

Yu Xi Terence LawLiang ShenVincent Wei Sheng KhorWeiren ChenWei Jing Kelven ChenPradeep DuraiVineet GauharKwok Ying LieKing Chien Joe Lee

Published in: International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association (2022)

Our study reveals that both interventions have similar overall risk of urosepsis, septic shock and mortality rate. Despite a marginally higher risk of failure, RUS should be considered in patients with lower procedural risk. Patients going for PCN should be counseled for a longer stay. Post-HDU/-ICU monitoring, inotrope support postdecompression should be considered for patients with elevated temperature within 1 h preintervention and cardiovascular SOFA score of 1.

Keyphrases

septic shock
end stage renal disease
chronic kidney disease
ejection fraction
peritoneal dialysis
intensive care unit
physical activity
cardiovascular disease
cardiovascular events
patient reported outcomes
mechanical ventilation
risk factors
acute respiratory distress syndrome
breast cancer risk