Common and Uncommon Errors in Emergency Ultrasound.
Marco Di SerafinoFrancesca IacobellisMaria Laura SchillirĂ²Divina D'auriaFrancesco VerdeDario GrimaldiGiuseppina Dell'Aversano OrabonaAndrea Delli PizziVittorio SabatinoChiara RinaldoPasquale GuerrieroVito CantisaniGianfranco ValloneLuigia RomanoPublished in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2022)
Errors in emergency ultrasound (US) have been representing an increasing problem in recent years thanks to several unique features related to both the inherent characteristics of the discipline and to the latest developments, which every medical operator should be aware of. Because of the subjective nature of the interpretation of emergency US findings, it is more prone to errors than other diagnostic imaging modalities. The misinterpretation of US images should therefore be considered as a serious risk in diagnosis. The etiology of error is multi-factorial: it depends on environmental factors, patients and the technical skills of the operator; it is influenced by intrinsic US artifacts, poor clinical correlation, US-setting errors and anatomical variants; and it is conditioned by the lack of a methodologically correct clinical approach and excessive diagnostic confidence too. In this review, we evaluate the common and uncommon sources of diagnostic errors in emergency US during clinical practice, showing how to recognize and avoid them.
Keyphrases
- public health
- emergency department
- patient safety
- adverse drug
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- clinical practice
- chronic kidney disease
- emergency medical
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- high resolution
- deep learning
- peritoneal dialysis
- copy number
- drinking water
- convolutional neural network
- physical activity
- patient reported outcomes
- magnetic resonance
- weight gain
- quality improvement
- machine learning
- contrast enhanced ultrasound
- sleep quality
- medical students