Modelling the impact of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous immunotherapy on patient travel time and CO 2 emissions in Sweden.
Lars-Olaf CardellThomas SternerWaqas AhmedAndreas Kallsoy SlættanesMikael SvärdRichard F PollockPublished in: Scientific reports (2024)
In Sweden, allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is available as either subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) injections or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets and is used to treat moderate-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This study sought to determine treatment-related CO 2 emissions and travel times in Swedish patients receiving either SCIT or SLIT-tablets. A list of specialized Swedish AR clinics that administer AIT was determined, and respective co-ordinates retrieved. Swedish municipality population data were obtained from a national database. The mean distance from each Swedish municipality to the nearest AR clinic was calculated, adjusted using a detour index, and weighted by estimated patient population size. Transport modality data were obtained from a Swedish urban transport study and CO 2 emissions were obtained from Government sources. The mean number of annual SLIT-tablets and SCIT doses required were calculated based on product labels and clinical expert input. The annual number of healthcare professional interactions were layered into the model to estimate changes in mean patient travel time, distance, and travel-related CO 2 emissions associated with using SCIT versus SLIT-tablets. Mean annual travel-related CO 2 emissions were 410 tonnes (to two significant figures [s.f.]; standard deviation [SD] 90) with SLIT-tablets, versus 1700 tonnes (SD 380) for SCIT, resulting in mean annual savings of approximately 1300 tonnes (SD 290) of CO 2 if all AIT patients were to receive SLIT-tablets instead of SCIT, over 380 times greater than 2021 average Swedish CO 2 emissions per capita. Approximate mean annual travel times for patients taking SLIT-tablets were 66,500 h (three s.f.; SD 14,400), and 278,000 h (SD 60,200) for SCIT, resulting in mean annual savings of 211,000 h (SD 45,800) if all AIT patients were to receive SLIT-tablets instead of SCIT. Compared with SCIT injections, SLIT-tablets led to substantial reductions in treatment-related CO 2 emissions and travel times for Swedish patients.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- primary care
- patient reported outcomes
- allergic rhinitis
- magnetic resonance imaging
- emergency department
- magnetic resonance
- risk assessment
- case report
- computed tomography
- gold nanoparticles
- social media
- early onset
- patient reported
- heavy metals
- artificial intelligence
- health information
- atopic dermatitis
- platelet rich plasma
- replacement therapy