Comparative Analysis of Natural and Cytochalasin B-Induced Membrane Vesicles from Tumor Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Zarema GilazievaDaria Sergeevna ChulpanovaAleksei PonomarevIvan Yurevich FilinEkaterina GaraninaAlbert Anatolyevich RizvanovValeriya Vladimirovna SolovyevaPublished in: Current issues in molecular biology (2022)
To date, there are numerous protocols for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Depending on the isolation method, it is possible to obtain vesicles with different characteristics, enriched with specific groups of proteins, DNA and RNA, which affect similar types of cells in the opposite way. Therefore, it is important to study and compare methods of vesicle isolation. Moreover, the differences between the EVs derived from tumor and mesenchymal stem cells are still poorly understood. This article compares EVs from human glioblastoma cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) obtained by two different methods, ultracentrifugation and cytochalasin B-mediated induction. The size of the vesicles, the presence of the main EV markers, the presence of nuclear and mitochondrial components, and the molecular composition of the vesicles were determined. It has been shown that EVs obtained by both ultracentrifugation and cytochalasin B treatment have similar features, contain particles of endogenous and membrane origin and can interact with monolayer cultures of tumor cells.
Keyphrases
- mesenchymal stem cells
- umbilical cord
- induced apoptosis
- cell cycle arrest
- bone marrow
- cell therapy
- oxidative stress
- endothelial cells
- single molecule
- signaling pathway
- endoplasmic reticulum stress
- cell death
- cell free
- stem cells
- circulating tumor
- drug induced
- replacement therapy
- stress induced
- circulating tumor cells