A Comparison of Outcomes Between Transfemoral Versus Transradial Access for Carotid Stenting.
Kareem El NaamaniOmaditya KhannaAmit SyalArbaz A MominRawad AbbasAbdelaziz AmllayAbhijeet SambangiAdam HuntJaime DoughertyCharles L LawallStavropoula I TjoumakarisM Reid GoochNabeel A HerialRobert H RosenwasserHekmat ZarzourRichard F SchmidtPascal M JabbourPublished in: Neurosurgery (2023)
The TR approach is safe, feasible, and provides similar rates of complications and high rates of successful stent deployment compared with the TF route. Neurointerventionalists adopting the radial first approach should carefully assess the preprocedural computed tomography angiography to identify patients amenable to TR approach for carotid stenting.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- antiplatelet therapy
- coronary artery
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- prognostic factors
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- type diabetes
- heart failure
- patient reported outcomes
- metabolic syndrome
- magnetic resonance imaging
- magnetic resonance
- left ventricular
- adipose tissue
- aortic stenosis
- atrial fibrillation
- patient reported
- image quality