Quantifying professionalism in peer review.

Travis G GerwingAlyssa M Allen GerwingStephanie Avery-GommChi-Yeung ChoiJeff C ClementsJoshua A Rash

Published in: Research integrity and peer review (2020)

The large number of unprofessional comments, and IIUCs observed could heighten psychological distress among investigators, particularly those at an early stage in their career. We suggest that development and adherence to a universally agreed upon reviewer code of conduct is necessary to improve the quality and professional experience of peer review.

Keyphrases

early stage
social media
quality improvement
radiation therapy
sleep quality
physical activity
medical students
depressive symptoms
adipose tissue
sentinel lymph node
insulin resistance