Login / Signup

Serial femtosecond and serial synchrotron crystallography can yield data of equivalent quality: A systematic comparison.

Pedram MehrabiRobert BückerGleb BourenkovH M GinnDavid von StettenHenrike M Müller-WerkmeisterA KuoTakefumi MorizumiB T EgerW-L OuS OghbaeyA SarraciniJessica E BesawO Pare-LabrosseS MeierH SchikoraFriedjof TellkampA MarxDarren A SherrellDanny N AxfordRobin L OwenOliver P ErnstEmil F PaiEike-Christian SchulzR J Dwyane Miller
Published in: Science advances (2021)
For the two proteins myoglobin and fluoroacetate dehalogenase, we present a systematic comparison of crystallographic diffraction data collected by serial femtosecond (SFX) and serial synchrotron crystallography (SSX). To maximize comparability, we used the same batch of micron-sized crystals, the same sample delivery device, and the same data analysis software. Overall figures of merit indicate that the data of both radiation sources are of equivalent quality. For both proteins, reasonable data statistics can be obtained with approximately 5000 room-temperature diffraction images irrespective of the radiation source. The direct comparability of SSX and SFX data indicates that the quality of diffraction data obtained from these samples is linked to the properties of the crystals rather than to the radiation source. Therefore, for other systems with similar properties, time-resolved experiments can be conducted at the radiation source that best matches the desired time resolution.
Keyphrases
  • data analysis
  • room temperature
  • electronic health record
  • big data
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • artificial intelligence
  • convolutional neural network
  • single molecule