Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Canadian Cost-Utility Analysis.
Kimberly GuinanKarine MathurinYunghan AuAndre C SchuhCat N BuiXinglei ChaiJean LachainePublished in: Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) (2022)
Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) typically involves intensive chemotherapy (IC); however, there is an unmet need for approximately 50% of AML patients who are deemed unfit or ineligible for IC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, from a Canadian perspective, the economic impact of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (Ven+Aza) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AML who are 75 years or older or who have comorbidities that preclude using IC. A lifetime partitioned survival model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of Ven+Aza compared with Aza. Health states included event-free survival, progressive/relapsed disease, and death. Efficacy parameters were based on the VIALE-A trial. Analyses were conducted from Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspectives. Over a lifetime horizon, Ven+Aza was associated with a gain of 1.65 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with Aza. From an MoH perspective, Ven+Aza and Aza were associated with total costs of $204,305 and $82,333, respectively, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio of $73,841/QALY. Results were similar from a societal perspective. This economic evaluation demonstrates that, in comparison with Aza, Ven+Aza is a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AML who are deemed unfit for IC.
Keyphrases
- acute myeloid leukemia
- newly diagnosed
- allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- healthcare
- public health
- free survival
- mental health
- multiple sclerosis
- squamous cell carcinoma
- ejection fraction
- radiation therapy
- risk assessment
- study protocol
- combination therapy
- quality improvement
- smoking cessation
- chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- open label