The impact of decision tools during oncological consultation with lung cancer patients: A systematic review within the I3LUNG project.
Valeria SebriChiara MarzoratiPatrizia DorangricchiaDario MonzaniRoberto GrassoArsela PrelajLeonardo ProvenzanoLaura MazzeoAndra Diana DumitrascuJana SonnekMarlen SzewczykIris WatermannFrancesco TrovòNina DollisEvangelos SarrisMarina Chiara GarassinoChristine M BestvinaAlessandra PedrocchiEmilia AmbrosiniSokol KostaEnriqueta FelipMireia SoledaAina Arbusà RocaJose Rodríguez-MoratóAlessandro NuaraYonah LourieMelissa Fernandez-PintoAlfonso AguaronGabriella PravettoniPublished in: Cancer medicine (2024)
Future review efforts could utilize alternative search strategies to explore other lung cancer-specific outcomes during medical consultations for treatment decisions and the implementation of decision aid tools. Engaging with experts in the fields of oncology, patient decision-making, or health communication could provide valuable insights and recommendations for relevant literature or research directions that may not be readily accessible through traditional search methods. The development of guidelines for future research were provided with the aim to promote decision aids focused on patients' needs.
Keyphrases
- decision making
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- systematic review
- quality improvement
- peritoneal dialysis
- public health
- palliative care
- primary care
- mental health
- patient reported outcomes
- skeletal muscle
- rectal cancer
- insulin resistance
- metabolic syndrome
- case report
- social media
- climate change
- robot assisted
- human health