Mitral valve repair: Regulatory or ethical problem?
Khalil FattouchAntonio Maria CalafiorePublished in: Journal of cardiac surgery (2022)
The long-term outcome of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) is based on what happens during the more or less 60 min of aortic cross-clamping necessary to transform a leaking valve into a well-functioning one. As a consequence, the experience of the surgeon performing the procedure is the only determinant of the success rate that deserves to be taken into account. It is clear from the literature that the number of cases/year is inversely related to the number of early and late deaths, repair failures, and reoperations. However, there is no agreement on the minimum caseload/year that represents the threshold to identify surgeons that can perform or not MVr. This problem then cannot be regulated by specific guidelines of Scientific Societies, but only by the ethical perception, we have of our profession.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- patients undergoing
- systematic review
- decision making
- mitral valve
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- quality improvement
- aortic stenosis
- transcription factor
- left ventricular
- clinical practice
- pulmonary artery
- robot assisted
- coronary artery
- thoracic surgery
- aortic dissection
- coronary artery disease
- atrial fibrillation