Login / Signup

Sub-classification of laparoscopic left hepatectomy based on hierarchic interaction of tumor location and size with perioperative outcomes.

Andrea RuzzenenteBernardo Dalla ValleEdoardo PolettoNicholas Li-Xun SynTousif KabirAtsushi SugiokaFederica CiprianiDaniel CherquiHo-Seong HanThomas ArmstrongTran Cong Duy LongOlivier ScattonPaolo HermanJohann PratschkeDavit L AghayanRong LiuMarco Vito MarinoAdrian K H ChiowIswanto SucandyArpad IvaneczMarco VivarelliFabrizio Di BenedettoSung-Hoon ChoiJae Hoon LeeMikel PrietoConstantino FondevilaMikhail EfanovFernando RotellarGi-Hong ChoiRicardo Robles-CamposXiaoying WangRobert P SutcliffeEric C H LaiCharing C ChongMathieu D'HondtChee Chien YongRoberto I TroisiT Peter KinghamAlessandro FerreroGiovanni Battista Levi SandriOlivier SoubraneMengqiu YinSantiago Lopez-BenVincenzo MazzaferroFelice GiulianteKazateru MondenKohei MishimaGo WakabayashiTan-To CheungDavid FuksMohammad Abu HilalKuo-Hsin ChenLuca AldrighettiBjorn EdwinBrian Kim Poh Gohnull null
Published in: Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences (2023)
L-LH for tumors that are >40mm in diameter and located in PS Segment 4a are associated with the highest degree of technical difficulty. However, post-operative outcomes were not different from L-LH of smaller tumours located in PS segments, or tumors located in the antero-lateral segments.
Keyphrases
  • machine learning
  • cardiac surgery
  • patients undergoing
  • robot assisted
  • minimally invasive
  • acute kidney injury
  • metabolic syndrome
  • insulin resistance
  • weight loss
  • optical coherence tomography