Recursive Partitioning vs Computerized Adaptive Testing to Reduce the Burden of Health Assessments in Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Comparative Simulation Study.
Conrad J HarrisonChris Chris Sidey-GibbonsAnne F KlassenKaren W Y Wong RiffDominic FurnissMarc C SwanJeremy Neil RodriguesPublished in: Journal of medical Internet research (2021)
When predicting CLEFT-Q scores, individual item responses are generally more informative than clinician-reported data. Decision trees that make binary splits are at risk of underfitting polytomous patient-reported outcome measure data and demonstrated poorer performance than CATs in this study.