Analysis of composite time-to-event endpoints in cardiovascular outcome trials.
Rachel Marceau WestGregory GolmDevan V MehrotraPublished in: Clinical trials (London, England) (2024)
Composite time-to-event endpoints are commonly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. For example, the IMPROVE-IT trial comparing ezetimibe+simvastatin to placebo+simvastatin in 18,144 patients with acute coronary syndrome used a primary composite endpoint with five component outcomes: (1) cardiovascular death, (2) non-fatal stroke, (3) non-fatal myocardial infarction, (4) coronary revascularization ≥30 days after randomization, and (5) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. In such settings, the traditional analysis compares treatments using the observed time to the occurrence of the first (i.e. earliest) component outcome for each patient. This approach ignores information for subsequent outcome(s), possibly leading to reduced power to demonstrate the benefit of the test versus the control treatment. We use real data examples and simulations to contrast the traditional approach with several alternative approaches that use data for all the intra-patient component outcomes, not just the first.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery disease
- coronary artery
- heart failure
- electronic health record
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- magnetic resonance
- risk assessment
- atrial fibrillation
- big data
- clinical trial
- magnetic resonance imaging
- machine learning
- computed tomography
- phase iii
- study protocol
- adipose tissue
- blood brain barrier
- acute coronary syndrome
- data analysis
- insulin resistance
- deep learning
- contrast enhanced
- aortic stenosis
- health information
- smoking cessation