Artificial Intelligence Tool for Assessment of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules Detected with CT.
Roger Y KimJason L OkeLyndsey C PickupReginald F MundenTravis L DotsonChristina R BellingerAvi CohenMichael J SimoffPierre P MassionClaire FilippiniFergus V GleesonAnil VachaniPublished in: Radiology (2022)
Background Limited data are available regarding whether computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) improves assessment of malignancy risk in indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs). Purpose To evaluate the effect of an artificial intelligence-based CAD tool on clinician IPN diagnostic performance and agreement for both malignancy risk categories and management recommendations. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective multireader multicase study performed in June and July 2020 on chest CT studies of IPNs. Readers used only CT imaging data and provided an estimate of malignancy risk and a management recommendation for each case without and with CAD. The effect of CAD on average reader diagnostic performance was assessed using the Obuchowski-Rockette and Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method to calculate estimates of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Multirater Fleiss κ statistics were used to measure interobserver agreement for malignancy risk and management recommendations. Results A total of 300 chest CT scans of IPNs with maximal diameters of 5-30 mm (50.0% malignant) were reviewed by 12 readers (six radiologists, six pulmonologists) (patient median age, 65 years; IQR, 59-71 years; 164 [55%] men). Readers' average AUC improved from 0.82 to 0.89 with CAD ( P < .001). At malignancy risk thresholds of 5% and 65%, use of CAD improved average sensitivity from 94.1% to 97.9% ( P = .01) and from 52.6% to 63.1% ( P < .001), respectively. Average reader specificity improved from 37.4% to 42.3% ( P = .03) and from 87.3% to 89.9% ( P = .05), respectively. Reader interobserver agreement improved with CAD for both the less than 5% (Fleiss κ, 0.50 vs 0.71; P < .001) and more than 65% (Fleiss κ, 0.54 vs 0.71; P < .001) malignancy risk categories. Overall reader interobserver agreement for management recommendation categories (no action, CT surveillance, diagnostic procedure) also improved with CAD (Fleiss κ, 0.44 vs 0.52; P = .001). Conclusion Use of computer-aided diagnosis improved estimation of indeterminate pulmonary nodule malignancy risk on chest CT scans and improved interobserver agreement for both risk stratification and management recommendations. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article . See also the editorial by Yanagawa in this issue.
Keyphrases
- artificial intelligence
- coronary artery disease
- computed tomography
- dual energy
- contrast enhanced
- big data
- machine learning
- image quality
- healthcare
- public health
- magnetic resonance imaging
- high resolution
- deep learning
- positron emission tomography
- heart rate
- mass spectrometry
- body composition
- photodynamic therapy
- case report
- high intensity
- resistance training
- structural basis