Should Glucokinase be Given a Chance in Diabetes Therapeutics? A Clinical-Pharmacological Review of Dorzagliatin and Lessons Learned So Far.

Despite advances in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one-third of patients with diabetes do not achieve the desired glycemic goal. Considering this inadequacy, many agents that activate glucokinase have been investigated over the last two decades but were withdrawn before submission for marketing permission. Dorzagliatin is the first glucokinase activator that has been granted approval for T2DM, only in China. As overstimulation of glucokinase is linked with pathophysiological disturbances such as fatty liver and cardiovascular issues and a loss of therapeutic efficacy with time. This review aims to highlight the benefits of glucokinase activators vis-à-vis the risks associated with chronic enzymatic activation. We discuss the multisystem disturbances expected with chronic activation of the enzyme, the lessons learned with glucokinase activators of the past, the major efficacy and safety findings with dorzagliatin and its pharmacological properties, and the status of other glucokinase activators in the pipeline. The approval of dorzagliatin in China was based on the SEED and the DAWN trials, the major pivotal phase III trials that enrolled patients with T2DM with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.3-8.4%, and a mean age of 53-54.5 years from multiple sites in China. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac diseases, organ dysfunction, and a history of severe hypoglycemia were excluded. Both trials had a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase of 24 weeks followed by an open-label phase of 28 weeks with dorzagliatin. Drug-naïve patients with T2DM with a disease duration of 11.7 months were enrolled in the SEED trial while the DAWN trial involved patients with T2DM with a mean duration of 71.5 months and receiving background metformin therapy. Compared with placebo, the decline in glycosylated hemoglobin at 24 weeks was more with dorzagliatin with an estimated treatment difference of - 0.57% in the SEED trial and - 0.66% in the DAWN trial. The desired glycosylated hemoglobin (< 7%) was also attained at more than two times higher rates with dorzagliatin. The glycemic improvement was sustained in the SEED trial but decreased over 52 weeks in the DAWN trial. Hyperlipidemia was observed in 12-14% of patients taking dorzagliatin versus 9-11% of patients receiving a placebo. Additional adverse effects noticed over 52 weeks with dorzagliatin included an elevation in liver enzymes, hyperuricemia, hyperlacticacidemia, renal dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances. Considering the statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin with dorzagliatin in patients with T2DM, the drug may be given a chance in treatment-naïve patients with a shorter disease history. However, with the waning therapeutic efficacy witnessed in patients with long-standing diabetes, which was also one of the potential concerns with previously tested molecules, extended studies involving patients with chronic and uncontrolled diabetes are needed to comment upon the long-term therapeutic performance of dorzagliatin. Likewise, evidence needs to be generated from other countries, patients with organ dysfunction, a history of severe hypoglycemia, cardiac diseases, and elderly patients before extending the use of dorzagliatin. Apart from monitoring lipid profiles, long-term safety studies of dorzagliatin should involve the assessment of serum uric acid, lactate, renal function, liver function, and cardiovascular parameters.