Predictors of bleeding and thrombotic events among patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer: insights from the ACTION randomized clinical trial.
Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E SilvaRemo H M FurtadoMariana Silveira de Alcântara ChaudAriane Vieira Scarlatelli MacedoBruna BronharaLucas Petri DamianiLilian Mazza BarbosaMayra Akimi SuiamaEduardo RamacciottiPriscilla de Aquino MartinsAryadne Lyrio de OliveiraVinicius Santana NunesLuiz Eduardo Fonteles RittAna Thereza RochaLucas TramujasSueli V SantosDario Rafael Abregu DiazLorena Souza VianaLívia Maria Garcia MelroEstêvão Lanna FigueiredoFernando Carvalho NeuenschwanderMarianna Deway Andrade DracoulakisRodolfo Godinho Souza Dourado LimaVicente Cés de Souza DantasAnne Cristine Silva FernandesOtávio Celso Eluf GebaraMauro Esteves HernandesDiego Aparecido Rios QueirozViviane C VeigaManoel Fernandes CanesinLeonardo Meira de FariaGilson Soares Feitosa-FilhoMarcelo Basso GazzanaIdelzuíta Leandro LiporaceAline de Oliveira TwardowskyLilia Nigro MaiaFlávia Ribeiro MachadoAlexandre de Matos SoeiroGermano Emílio Conceição-SouzaLuciana ArmaganijanPatrícia O GuimarãesRegis G RosaLuciano C P AzevedoJohn H AlexanderAlvaro AvezumOtávio BerwangerAlexandre B CavalcantiRenato D Lopesnull nullPublished in: Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis (2024)
Therapeutic anticoagulation showed inconsistent results in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and selection of the best patients to use this strategy still a challenge balancing the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. The present post-hoc analysis of the ACTION trial evaluated the variables independently associated with both bleeding events (major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) and the composite outcomes thrombotic events (venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or major adverse limb events). Variables were assessed one by one with independent logistic regressions and final models were chosen based on Akaike information criteria. The model for bleeding events showed an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.73), while the model for thrombotic events had an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.79). Non-invasive respiratory support was associated with thrombotic but not bleeding events, while invasive ventilation was associated with both outcomes (Odds Ratio of 7.03 [95 CI% 1.95 to 25.18] for thrombotic and 3.14 [95% CI 1.11 to 8.84] for bleeding events). Beyond respiratory support, creatinine level (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.01 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02 for every 1.0 mg/dL) and history of coronary disease (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.32 to 10.29) were also independently associated to the risk of thrombotic events. Non-invasive respiratory support, history of coronary disease, and creatinine level may help to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at higher risk of thrombotic complications.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04394377.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- venous thromboembolism
- sars cov
- coronavirus disease
- coronary artery disease
- coronary artery
- randomized controlled trial
- emergency department
- type diabetes
- study protocol
- newly diagnosed
- respiratory tract
- mechanical ventilation
- insulin resistance
- health information
- patient reported outcomes
- aortic valve
- adverse drug
- brain injury
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- open label