Realistic Evaluation of a Rapid Response System: Context, Mechanisms, and Outcomes.
Jacinda L BunchPatricia S GrovesYelena PerkhounkovaPublished in: Western journal of nursing research (2018)
The purpose of this study was to describe and explore differences between rapid response system events in a Midwestern community hospital through context, mechanism, and outcome factors. The design was a retrospective review of 1,939 adult inpatient events that occurred on medical (62.8%) and surgical units (37.2%) over 92 months. The immediate outcomes of the events were stabilization (59.0%), transfer to a higher level of care (39%), and cardiopulmonary arrest (2%). Nurses activated 94% of all rapid response events; respiratory (38.8%) and cardiac (29.2%) symptoms were the most common triggers, and worry alone triggered 23% of all events. Medical and surgical events were significantly different with regard to antecedents to unit arrival, most common triggers, immediate clinical outcomes, and occurrence during resource-limited times. Understanding rapid response events and differences between medical and surgical units is important to improve early identification of deterioration and thus intervention for vulnerable patients.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- mental health
- palliative care
- randomized controlled trial
- end stage renal disease
- risk assessment
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- left ventricular
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- heart failure
- cell proliferation
- metabolic syndrome
- skeletal muscle
- chronic pain
- young adults
- pain management
- patient reported
- childhood cancer
- drug induced
- bioinformatics analysis