Login / Signup

A study of target effect sizes in randomised controlled trials published in the Health Technology Assessment journal.

Joanne C RothwellSteven A JuliousCindy L Cooper
Published in: Trials (2018)
The most commonly reported method of elicitation of the target effect size is previous published research. The average target effect size was 0.3. A clear distinction between the target difference and the minimum clinically important difference is recommended when designing a trial. Transparent explanation of target difference elicitation is advised, with multiple methods including a review of evidence and opinion-seeking advised as the more optimal methods for effect size quantification.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • clinical trial
  • randomized controlled trial
  • systematic review
  • study protocol
  • risk assessment
  • meta analyses