Login / Signup

Running Functional Threshold versus Critical Power: Same concept but different values.

Alberto A Ñancupil-AndradeSantiago A Ruiz-AliasAlejandro Pérez-CastillaDiego Jaén-CarrilloFelipe García-Pinillos
Published in: International journal of sports medicine (2023)
The aims of this study were (i) to estimate the functional threshold power (FTP) and critical power (CP) from single shorter time trials (TTs) (i.e., 10, 20 and 30 minutes) and (ii) to assess their location in the power-duration curve. Fifteen highly trained athletes randomly performed ten TTs (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 and 60 minutes). FTP was determined as the mean power output developed in the 60-minute TT, while CP was estimated in the running power meter platform according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The linear regression analysis revealed an acceptable FTP estimate for the 10, 20 and 30-minute TTs (SEE ≤ 12.27 W) corresponding to a correction factor of 85, 90 and 95%, respectively. An acceptable CP estimate was only observed for the 20-minute TT (SEE = 6.67 W) corresponding to a correction factor of 95%. The CP was located at the 30-minute power output (1.0 [-5.1 to 7.1] W), which was over FTP (14 [7.0 to 21] W). Therefore, athletes and practitioners concerned with determining FTP and CP through a feasible testing protocol are encouraged to perform a 20-minute TT and apply a correction factor of 90 and 95%, respectively.
Keyphrases
  • randomized controlled trial
  • primary care
  • high intensity
  • high throughput
  • single cell