Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.
Marco GiurgiuIrina TimmMarlissa BeckerSteffen Christian Ekkehard SchmidtKathrin WunschRebecca NissenDenis DavidovskiJohannes B J BussmannClaudio R NiggMarkus ReichertUlrich W Ebner-PriemerAlexander WollBirte von Haaren-MackPublished in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (2022)
Overall, free-living validation studies of wearables are characterized by low methodological quality, large variability in design, and focus on intensity. Future research should strongly aim at biological state and posture or activity outcomes and strive for standardized protocols embedded in a validation framework. Standardized protocols for free-living validation embedded in a framework are urgently needed to inform and guide stakeholders (eg, manufacturers, scientists, and consumers) in selecting wearables for self-tracking purposes, applying wearables in health studies, and fostering innovation to achieve improved validity.