Login / Signup

Contribution of major histocompatibility complex class II immunostaining in distinguishing idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subgroups: A histopathological cohort study.

Lola E R LessardMarie RobertTanguy FenouilRémi MounierVerena LandelMarie CarlesimoArnaud HotBénédicte ChazaudThomas LaumonierNathalie StreichenbergerLaure Gallay
Published in: Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology (2024)
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are rare, acquired muscle diseases; their diagnosis of is based on clinical, serological, and histological criteria. MHC-I-positive immunostaining, although non-specific, is used as a marker for IIM diagnosis; however, the significance of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II immunostaining in IIM remains debated. We investigated patterns of MHC-II immunostaining in myofibers and capillaries in muscle biopsies from 103 patients with dermatomyositis ([DM], n = 31), inclusion body myositis ([IBM], n = 24), anti-synthetase syndrome ([ASyS], n = 10), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy ([IMNM], n = 18), or overlap myositis ([OM], n = 20). MHC-II immunostaining of myofibers was abnormal in 63/103 of patients (61%) but the patterns differed according to the IIM subgroup. They were diffuse in IBM (96%), negative in IMNM (83%), perifascicular in ASyS (70%), negative (61%) or perifascicular (32%) in DM, and either clustered (40%), perifascicular (30%), or diffuse heterogeneous (15%) in OM. Capillary MHC-II immunostaining also identified quantitative (capillary dropout, n = 47/88, 53%) and qualitative abnormalities, that is, architectural abnormalities, including dilated and leaky capillaries, (n = 79/98, 81%) in all IIM subgroups. Thus, MHC-II myofiber expression patterns allow distinguishing among IIM subgroups. We suggest the addition of MHC-II immunostaining to routine histological panels for IIM diagnosis.
Keyphrases