Management of the adenocarcinoma of the upper rectum: a reappraisal.
George PechlivanidesSophia GourtsoyianniNikolaos GouvasJohn SougklakosEvangelos XynosPublished in: Updates in surgery (2020)
The present review attempts to assess whether upper rectal cancer (URC) should be treated either as colon cancer or as rectal one, namely to be managed with upfront surgery without neo-adjuvant treatment and partial mesorectal excision (PME), or with neo-adjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as indicated, followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision. Reports from current evidence including studies, reviews and various guidelines are conflicting. Main reasons for inability to reach safe conclusions are (i) the various anatomical definitions of the rectum and its upper part, (ii) the inadequate preoperative local staging,(iii) the heterogeneity of selection criteria for the neo-adjuvant treatment,(iv) the different neo-adjuvant treatment regimens, and(v) the variety in the extent of surgical resection, among the studies. Although not adequately supported, locally advanced URC can be treated with neo-adjuvant CRT provided the lesion is within the radiation field of safety, and a PME if the lower border of the tumour is located above the anterior peritoneal reflection. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-risk stage II and stage III lesions.
Keyphrases
- rectal cancer
- locally advanced
- early stage
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- squamous cell carcinoma
- minimally invasive
- phase ii study
- emergency department
- patients undergoing
- lymph node
- systematic review
- coronary artery disease
- randomized controlled trial
- replacement therapy
- left ventricular
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- clinical practice
- study protocol
- newly diagnosed
- pet ct