Login / Signup

Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.

Tapas PeshinShayak SenguptaInês Lima Azevedo
Published in: Environmental science & technology (2022)
We perform a state-specific life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gases (GHG) (CO 2eq ) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions in India for representative passenger vehicles (two-wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheelers, and buses) and technologies (internal combustion engine, battery electric, hybrid electric, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles). We find that in most states, four-wheeler battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) have higher GHG and SO 2 emissions than other conventional or alternative vehicles. Electrification of those vehicle classes under present conditions would not lead to emission reductions. Electrified buses and three-wheelers are the best strategies to reduce GHG emissions in many states, but they are also the worst strategy in terms of SO 2 emissions. Electrified two-wheelers have lower SO 2 emissions than gasoline in one state. The Indian grid would need to decrease its carbon dioxide emissions by 38-52% and SO 2 emissions by 58-97% (depending on the state) for widespread vehicle electrification for sustainability purposes to make sense. If the 2030 goals for India under the Glasgow COP are met, we find that four-wheeler BEVs still have higher GHG emissions in 18 states compared to a conventional gasoline compact four wheeler, and all states will have higher SO 2 emissions for BEVs across all vehicle types compared to their conventional counterparts.
Keyphrases
  • life cycle
  • municipal solid waste
  • carbon dioxide
  • public health
  • global health