Protocol digest of a phase III randomized trial of gross total resection versus possible resection of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense lesion on MRI for newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma: JCOG2209 (FLAMINGO).
Yuta SekinoYukihiko SonodaIchiyo ShibaharaJunki MizusawaKeita SasakiTetsuya SekitaMayumi IchikawaHiroshi IgakiManabu KinoshitaToshihiro KumabeJunji ShibaharaKoichi IchimuraYoshiki ArakawaHaruhiko Fukudanull nullYoshitaka NaritaPublished in: Japanese journal of clinical oncology (2024)
The goal of surgery for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is maximum safe resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. However, there is no consensus on the efficacy of FLAIRectomy, which is defined as the possible resection of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)-hyperintense lesions surrounding the CE lesion. Although retrospective analyses suggested the potential benefits of FLAIRectomy, such outcomes have not been confirmed by prospective studies. Therefore, we planned a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of FLAIRectomy compared with gross total resection of CE lesions in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The primary endpoint is overall survival. In total, 130 patients will be enrolled from 47 institutions over 5 years. This trial has been registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (study number jRCT1031230245).
Keyphrases
- phase iii
- newly diagnosed
- open label
- clinical trial
- double blind
- phase ii
- magnetic resonance imaging
- placebo controlled
- contrast enhanced
- study protocol
- phase ii study
- chronic kidney disease
- end stage renal disease
- cross sectional
- magnetic resonance
- diffusion weighted imaging
- computed tomography
- type diabetes
- coronary artery bypass
- coronary artery disease
- energy transfer
- acute coronary syndrome
- risk assessment
- quantum dots
- locally advanced
- weight loss
- adipose tissue