A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.
Kai-Uwe LewandrowskiIvo AbrahamJorge Felipe Ramírez LeónAlbert E TelfeianMorgan P LorioStefan HellingerMartin KnightPaulo Sérgio Teixeira De CarvalhoMax Rogério Freitas RamosÁlvaro DowlingManuel Rodriguez GarciaFauziyya MuhammadNamath HussainVicky YamamotoBabak KatebAnthony YeungPublished in: Journal of personalized medicine (2022)
clinical outcomes were more favorable with lumbar surgeries than with non-surgical control groups. Of the control patients, the crossover rate into interventional and surgical care was 40.3% and 37.2%, respectively. There are longer symptom-free intervals after targeted ELD than with TLIF or laminectomy. Additional intervention and surgical treatments are more often needed to manage new-onset postoperative symptoms in TLIF- and laminectomy compared to ELD patients. Few ELD patients will require fusion in the future. Considering the rising cost of surgical spine care, we offer SpineScreen as a simplified and less costly alternative to traditional image-based care models by focusing on primary pain generators rather than image-based criteria derived from the preoperative lumbar MRI scan.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- pain management
- randomized controlled trial
- chronic pain
- patients undergoing
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- spinal cord injury
- magnetic resonance
- acute coronary syndrome
- physical activity
- coronary artery disease
- cancer therapy
- drug delivery
- machine learning
- health insurance
- current status
- double blind