Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference improves the treatment of spondylodiscitis.
Dimitris NtalosB SchoofD M ThiesenL ViezensH KleinertzH RohdeA BothA LuebkeA StrahlM DreimannM StangenbergPublished in: Scientific reports (2021)
Establishing a multidisciplinary approach regarding the treatment of spondylodiscitis and analyzing its effect compared to a single discipline approach. 361 patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis were included in this retrospective pre-post intervention study. The treatment strategy was either established by a single discipline approach (n = 149, year 2003-2011) or by a weekly multidisciplinary infections conference (n = 212, year 2013-2018) consisting of at least an orthopedic surgeon, medical microbiologist, infectious disease specialist and pathologist. Recorded data included the surgical and antibiotic strategy, complications leading to operative revision, recovered microorganisms, as well as the total length of hospital and intensive care unit stay. Compared to a single discipline approach, performing the multidisciplinary infections conference led to significant changes in anti-infective and surgical treatment strategies. Patients discussed in the conference showed significantly reduced days of total antibiotic treatment (66 ± 31 vs 104 ± 31, p < 0.001). Moreover, one stage procedures and open transpedicular screw placement were more frequently performed following multidisciplinary discussions, while there were less involved spinal segments in terms of internal fixation as well as an increased use of intervertebral cages instead of autologous bone graft (p < 0.001). Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most frequently recovered organisms in both patient groups. No significant difference was found comparing inpatient complications between the two groups or the total in-hospital stay. Implementation of a weekly infections conference is an effective approach to introduce multidisciplinarity into spondylodiscitis management. These conferences significantly altered the treatment plan compared to a single discipline approach. Therefore, we highly recommend the implementation to optimize treatment modalities for patients.
Keyphrases
- staphylococcus aureus
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- intensive care unit
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- primary care
- chronic kidney disease
- stem cells
- palliative care
- mental health
- peritoneal dialysis
- spinal cord
- risk factors
- cystic fibrosis
- cross sectional
- minimally invasive
- patient reported outcomes
- case report
- acute care
- replacement therapy
- infectious diseases