Login / Signup

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Primary Digital Histopathology Evaluation and Peer Review for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Nonclinical Toxicology Studies.

Thomas ForestFamke AeffnerDinesh S BangariBhupinder BawaJonathan CarterJames D FikesWanda B HighShim-Mo HayashiMatthew JacobsenLuAnn McKinneyDaniel G RudmannThomas J SteinbachVanessa L SchumacherOliver C TurnerJerrold M WardCynthia J Willson
Published in: Toxicologic pathology (2022)
The Society of Toxicologic Pathology's Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee formed a working group to consider the present and future use of digital pathology in toxicologic pathology in general and specifically its use in primary evaluation and peer review in Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) environments. Digital histopathology systems can save costs by reducing travel, enhancing organizational flexibility, decreasing slide handling, improving collaboration, increasing access to historical images, and improving quality and efficiency through integration with laboratory information management systems. However, the resources to implement and operate a digital pathology system can be significant. Given the magnitude and risks involved in the decision to adopt digital histopathology, this working group used pertinent previously published survey results and its members' expertise to create a Points-to-Consider article to assist organizations with building and implementing digital pathology workflows. With the aim of providing a comprehensive perspective, the current publication summarizes aspects of digital whole-slide imaging relevant to nonclinical histopathology evaluations, and then presents points to consider applicable to both primary digital histopathology evaluation and digital peer review in GLP toxicology studies. The Supplemental Appendices provide additional tabulated resources.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • primary care
  • randomized controlled trial
  • quality improvement
  • transcription factor
  • risk assessment
  • systematic review
  • photodynamic therapy
  • human health
  • decision making