Login / Signup

On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience.

Daniel LevensteinVeronica A AlvarezAsohan AmarasinghamHabiba AzabZhe Sage ChenRichard C GerkinAndrea R HasenstaubRamakrishnan IyerRenaud B JolivetSarah MarzenJoseph D MonacoAstrid A PrinzSalma QuraishiFidel SantamariaSabyasachi ShivkumarMatthew F SinghRoger D TraubFarzan NadimHoracio G RotsteinA David Redish
Published in: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience (2023)
In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena that cross a wide range of scales and often require consideration at varying degrees of abstraction, from precise biophysical interactions to the computations they implement. We argue that a pragmatic perspective of science, in which descriptive, mechanistic, and normative models and theories each play a distinct role in defining and bridging levels of abstraction, will facilitate neuroscientific practice. This analysis leads to methodological suggestions, including selecting a level of abstraction that is appropriate for a given problem, identifying transfer functions to connect models and data, and the use of models themselves as a form of experiment.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • public health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • electronic health record
  • study protocol
  • high resolution
  • quality improvement
  • clinical trial
  • mass spectrometry
  • artificial intelligence
  • double blind