Axillary evaluation in ductal cancer in situ of the breast: challenging the diagnostic accuracy of clinical practice guidelines.
Andreas KarakatsanisPetros CharalampoudisLida PistioliRosa Di MiccoTheodoros FoukakisAntonios Valachisnull nullPublished in: The British journal of surgery (2021)
The decision whether to operate on the axilla in women with a diagnosis of ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is based on the risk of an undiagnosed underlying invasive cancer and on the concern that resection of the breast will not allow for accurate axillary mapping afterwards. Guidelines stem from older knowledge and are heterogeneous. In this study, different breast cancer guidelines were tested in a patient cohort from the SentiNot prospective trial for uniformity of interpretation and diagnostic accuracy. Results show that guidelines did not allow for easy and uniform interpretation and had the predictive ability of the toss of a coin. This suggests that guidelines regarding the need of axillary evaluation in patients operated for DCIS need to be revised and that techniques that will address the conundrum should be developed.
Keyphrases
- papillary thyroid
- lymph node
- sentinel lymph node
- clinical practice
- squamous cell
- end stage renal disease
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- high resolution
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- clinical trial
- ultrasound guided
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- physical activity
- study protocol
- childhood cancer
- early stage
- squamous cell carcinoma
- radiation therapy
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- mass spectrometry
- decision making