Login / Signup

A Review of Histological Techniques for Differentiating Human Bone from Animal Bone.

Emanuela StanCamelia-Oana MuresanEcaterina DaescuRaluca DumacheVeronica CiocanStefania UngureanuDan CostachescuAlexandra Enache
Published in: Methods and protocols (2024)
The first step in anthropological study is the positive identification of human remains, which can be a challenging undertaking when bones are broken. When bone pieces from different species are mixed together, it can be crucial to distinguish between them in forensic and archaeological contexts. For years, anthropology and archaeology have employed the histomorphological analysis of bones to evaluate species-specific variations. Based on variations in the dimensions and configuration of Haversian systems between the two groups, these techniques have been devised to distinguish between non-human and human bones. All of those techniques concentrate on a very particular kind of bone, zone, and segment. Histomorphometric techniques make the assumption that there are size, form, and quantity variations between non-humans and humans. The structural components of Haversian bones are significant enough to use discriminant function analysis to separate one from the other. This review proposes a comprehensive literature analysis of the various strategies or techniques available for distinguishing human from non-human bones to demonstrate that histomorphological analysis is the most effective method to be used in the case of inadequate or compromised samples.
Keyphrases
  • endothelial cells
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • systematic review
  • magnetic resonance
  • soft tissue
  • body composition
  • bone regeneration