Personalized Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Striking a Balance Between Bleeding and Thrombosis.
Jonathan ShpigelmanAnastasia ProshkinaMichael J DalyDermot CoxPublished in: Current cardiology reports (2023)
inhibitors, genetic influences on aspirin non-response appear to be outweighed by a triad of clinical factors: non-adherence, enteric aspirin use, and inappropriate dosing according to bodyweight and BMI. Multiple de-escalation strategies for DAPT have been shown to mitigate bleeding risk, but it remains unclear which approach is ideal, necessitating head-to-head investigations to determine which exhibits the most favorable cost-to-benefit ratio. However, there is likely a role for more than one approach in clinical practice, depending on patient risk profile. Our approach to aspirin use is also in need of reassessment: strategies to improve adherence, avoidance of enteric aspirin in cardiac patients, and dose adjustment according to bodyweight and/or BMI are all likely to improve rates of therapeutic response. Moreover, platelet function testing may have a role in identifying patients expected to benefit from primary prophylactic aspirin.
Keyphrases
- antiplatelet therapy
- acute coronary syndrome
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- low dose
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- cardiovascular events
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- clinical practice
- body mass index
- randomized controlled trial
- peritoneal dialysis
- coronary artery disease
- gene expression
- clinical trial
- cardiovascular disease
- atrial fibrillation
- metabolic syndrome
- weight loss
- physical activity
- case report
- open label
- patient reported
- pulmonary embolism
- study protocol
- glycemic control