Cost-effectiveness of second-line nivolumab for platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Longfeng ZhangXiaofang ZengHongfu CaiNa LiMaobai LiuLingling QiuBin ZhengPublished in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2020)
Aim: To analyze the economic impact of nivolumab and chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed disease progression after platinum-containing dual-drug chemotherapy. Materials & methods: The partitioned survival model was used to analyze the cost-utility of two NSCLC treatments by nivolumab and docetaxel. The clinical data resulted from the Phase III clinical trial. The cost parameters were derived from our previous studies, and the utility parameters were derived from the literature. Results: The quality-adjusted life-years of nivolumab and docetaxel were 0.778 and 0.336. The lifetime direct medical expenses of nivolumab and docetaxel were US$44,707.17 and US$12,826.72. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $72,127.71/quality-adjusted life-year. Conclusion: The combination of chemotherapy, nivolumab is not a cost-effective choice in the second-line treatment of NSCLC.
Keyphrases
- advanced non small cell lung cancer
- locally advanced
- clinical trial
- small cell lung cancer
- phase iii
- epidermal growth factor receptor
- open label
- rectal cancer
- systematic review
- squamous cell carcinoma
- healthcare
- radiation therapy
- phase ii
- double blind
- randomized controlled trial
- big data
- combination therapy
- electronic health record
- free survival