Why U.S. Patients Declined Hospital-at-Home during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.
Nels PaulsonMargaret P PaulsonMichael J ManiaciRachel A RutledgeShealeigh InselmanStephanie K ZawadaPublished in: Journal of patient experience (2023)
To understand why US patients refused participation in hospital-at-home (H@H) during the coronavirus disease 2019 Public Health Emergency, eligible adult patients seen at 2 Mayo Clinic sites, Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin region (NWWI) and Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF), from August 2021 through March 2022, were invited to participate in a convergent-parallel study. Quantitative associations between H@H participation status and patient baseline data at hospital admission were investigated. H@H patients were more likely to have a Mayo Clinic patient portal at baseline ( P -value: .014), indicating a familiarity with telehealth. Patients who refused were more likely to be from NWWI ( P -value < .001) and have a higher Epic Deterioration Index score ( P -value: .004). The groups also had different quarters (in terms of fiscal calendar) of admission ( P -value: .040). Analyzing qualitative interviews (n = 13) about refusal reasons, 2 themes portraying the quantitative associations emerged: lack of clarity about H@H and perceived domestic challenges. To improve access to H@H and increase patient recruitment, improved education about the dynamics of H@H, for both hospital staff and patients, and inclusive strategies for navigating domestic barriers and diagnostic challenges are needed.
Keyphrases
- public health
- end stage renal disease
- coronavirus disease
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- emergency department
- primary care
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- case report
- clinical trial
- randomized controlled trial
- mental health
- high resolution
- depressive symptoms
- study protocol
- big data
- machine learning
- electronic health record
- data analysis