The impact of changing provider remuneration on clinical activity and quality of care: Evaluation of a pilot NHS contract in Northern Ireland.
Harry HillElizabeth HowarthTanya WalshMartin TickleStephen BirchPaul BrocklehurstPublished in: Community dentistry and oral epidemiology (2020)
General dental practitioners working in the NHS respond rapidly and consistently to changes in provider payment methods. A move from FFS to a capitation-based system had little impact on access to care, but did produce large reductions in clinical activity and patient charge income. Patients noticed little change in the service they received. This shows that changes in remuneration contracts have the potential to meet policy goals, such as meeting the expectations of patients within a predictable cost envelope. However, it is unlikely that all policy goals can be met simply by changing payment methods. Therefore, work is also needed to identify and evaluate interventions that can complement changes in remuneration to achieve desirable outcomes.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- mental health
- primary care
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- palliative care
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- quality improvement
- patient safety
- physical activity
- affordable care act
- health insurance
- randomized controlled trial
- case report
- chronic pain
- study protocol
- oral health