Login / Signup

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among English-Speaking Pregnant Women Living in Rural Western United States.

Elizabeth CoxMagali SanchezCarly BaxterIsabelle CraryEmma EveryJeff MunsonSimone StapleyAlex StonehillKatherine TaylorWillamina WidmannHilary KaraszKristina M Adams Waldorf
Published in: Vaccines (2023)
This mixed-method study investigated vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women living in rural western United States and their response to social media ads promoting COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Thirty pregnant or recently pregnant participants who live in rural zip codes in Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho were interviewed between November 2022 and March 2023. Interviews were transcribed and coded, while the ad ratings were analyzed using linear mixed models. The study identified five main themes related to vaccine uptake, including perceived risk of COVID, sources of health information, vaccine hesitancy, and relationships with care providers. Participants rated ads most highly that used peer-based messengers and negative outcome-based content. Ads with faith-based and elder messengers were rated significantly lower than peer messengers ( p = 0.04 and 0.001, respectively). An activation message was also rated significantly less favorably than negative outcome-based content ( p = 0.001). Participants preferred evidence-based information and the ability to conduct their own research on vaccine safety and efficacy rather than being told to get vaccinated. Primary concerns of vaccine-hesitant respondents included the short amount of time the vaccine had been available and perceived lack of research on its safety during pregnancy. Our findings suggests that tailored messaging using peer-based messengers and negative outcome-based content can positively impact vaccine uptake among pregnant women living in rural areas of the Western United States.
Keyphrases