Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy versus tiotropium monotherapy in patients with COPD.
Sandeep BansalMartin AndersonAntonio AnzuetoNicola BrownChris ComptonThomas C CorbridgeDavid ErbCatherine HarveyMorrys C KaisermannMitchell KayeDavid A LipsonNeil MartinChang-Qing ZhuAlberto PapiPublished in: NPJ primary care respiratory medicine (2021)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines do not currently include recommendations for escalation directly from monotherapy to triple therapy. This 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study randomized 800 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients receiving tiotropium (TIO) for ≥3 months to once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA (n = 400) or TIO 18 mcg via HandiHaler (n = 400) plus matched placebo. Study endpoints included change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at Days 85 (primary), 28 and 84 (secondary), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD Assessment Test [CAT]) and safety. FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved trough FEV1 at all timepoints (Day 85 treatment difference [95% CI] 95 mL [62-128]; P < 0.001), and significantly improved SGRQ and CAT versus TIO. Treatment safety profiles were similar. Once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved lung function and health status versus once-daily TIO in symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients, with a similar safety profile.
Keyphrases
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- lung function
- double blind
- cystic fibrosis
- placebo controlled
- air pollution
- open label
- combination therapy
- clinical trial
- quantum dots
- stem cells
- randomized controlled trial
- intensive care unit
- phase ii
- visible light
- mass spectrometry
- mesenchymal stem cells
- bone marrow
- study protocol
- replacement therapy
- solid phase extraction
- liquid chromatography