A Review of Treatment for Acute and Chronic Pars Fractures in the Lumbar Spine.
Alexander A LintonWellington K HsuPublished in: Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine (2022)
Recent data has provided more information on how pars defect laterality, stage, and presence or absence of bone marrow edema impact healing potential. Other studies have highlighted the advantages of using MRI for spondylolysis diagnosis. Other data has provided more clarity on which adults may benefit from direct pars repair, while other studies have compared the various techniques for direct repair of pars defects. While the exact cause of spondylolysis remains unclear, there is growing understanding of the behavioral, genetic, and biomechanical risk factors that predispose individuals to the condition. MRI may be emerging as the advanced imaging modality of choice for diagnosis due to its lack of radiation and comparable sensitivity to other advanced imaging techniques. Conservative treatment remains the first step in management due to excellent outcomes in most patients, with surgical intervention rarely necessary. In patients that do require surgery, direct repair using a pedicle screw-based approach is preferred over spinal fusion and other direct repair techniques.
Keyphrases
- bone marrow
- risk factors
- high resolution
- magnetic resonance imaging
- end stage renal disease
- randomized controlled trial
- contrast enhanced
- ejection fraction
- electronic health record
- newly diagnosed
- minimally invasive
- healthcare
- spinal cord
- liver failure
- prognostic factors
- chronic kidney disease
- mass spectrometry
- gene expression
- magnetic resonance
- metabolic syndrome
- computed tomography
- genome wide
- peritoneal dialysis
- respiratory failure
- dna methylation
- adipose tissue
- decision making
- hepatitis b virus
- molecular dynamics
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- climate change
- weight loss
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- finite element
- finite element analysis