Main prophylactic measures in bariatric endoscopy. Spanish Expert Recommendations Guideline.
Eduardo Espinet CollRomán Turró ArauAitor Orive CalzadaCarlos Dolz AbadíaAmador García Ruiz de GordejuelaAndrés Sánchez YagüeJavier Nebreda DuránManoel Galvao NetoGontrand López-Nava BreviereAlfredo Mata BilbaoAlfonso Alcalde VargasRamón Abad BelandoAndrés José Del Pozo-GarcíaJosé Miguel Esteban López-JamarJordi Pujol GebelliAntonio José Torres GarcíaJosé Antonio Ramírez FelipeMiguel Muñoz NavasPublished in: Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva (2021)
Bariatric endoscopy (BE) encompasses a number of techniques -some consolidated, some under development- aiming to contribute to the management of obese patients and their associated metabolic diseases as a complement to dietary and lifestyle changes. To date different intragastric balloon models, suture systems, aspiration methods, substance injections and both gastric and duodenal malabsorptive devices have been developed, as well as endoscopic procedures for the revision of bariatric surgery. Their ongoing evolution conditions a gradual increase in the quantity and quality of scientific evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Despite this, scientific evidence remains inadequate to establish strong grades of recommendation allowing a unified perspective on prophylaxis in BE. This dearth of data conditions leads, in daily practice, to frequently extrapolate the measures that are used in bariatric surgery (BS) and/or in general therapeutic endoscopy. In this respect, this special article is intended to reach a consensus on the most common prophylactic measures we should apply in BE. The methodological design of this document was developed while attempting to comply with the following 5 phases: Phase 1: delimitation and scope of objectives, according to the GRADE Clinical Guidelines. Phase 2: setup of the Clinical Guide-developing Group: national experts, members of the Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica (GETTEMO, SEED), SEPD, and SECO, selecting 2 authors for each section. Phase 3: clinical question form (PICO): patients, intervention, comparison, outcomes. Phase 4: literature assessment and synthesis. Search for evidence and elaboration of recommendations. Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification, most evidence in this article will correspond to level 5 (expert opinions without explicit critical appraisal) and grade of recommendation C (favorable yet inconclusive recommendation) or D (inconclusive or inconsistent studies). Phase 5: External review by experts. We hope that these basic preventive measures will be of interest for daily practice, and may help prevent medical and/or legal conflicts for the benefit of patients, physicians, and BE in general.
Keyphrases
- bariatric surgery
- obese patients
- weight loss
- end stage renal disease
- clinical practice
- roux en y gastric bypass
- primary care
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- gastric bypass
- quality improvement
- healthcare
- physical activity
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- peritoneal dialysis
- ultrasound guided
- metabolic syndrome
- type diabetes
- total knee arthroplasty
- deep learning
- cardiovascular disease
- adipose tissue
- artificial intelligence
- platelet rich plasma