Login / Signup

Efficacy of transcutaneous perineal electrostimulation versus intracavitary anal electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence after a radical prostatectomy: Randomized controlled trial.

Regina Pané-AlemanyInés Ramírez-GarcíaStéphanie KauffmannLaia Blanco-RattoAndrea Carralero-MartínezEmília Sánchez Ruiz
Published in: Neurourology and urodynamics (2021)
Surface and intra-anal electrostimulation treatments reduced significantly losses of urine, but differences in grams of urine loss throughout the therapy between groups were not significant, suggesting that the efficacy of the two treatments is not statistically different. Nonetheless, the improvement observed in both groups was statistically significant and clinically relevant.
Keyphrases
  • radical prostatectomy
  • urinary incontinence
  • prostate cancer
  • randomized controlled trial
  • high grade
  • study protocol
  • stem cells
  • clinical trial
  • systematic review
  • cell therapy