The Nail in the Coffin?: Examining the KEYNOTE-789 Clinical Trial's Impact.
Zhaohui Liao ArterMisako NagasakaPublished in: Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) (2024)
Targeted therapies, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the emergence of resistance to EGFR TKIs especially the third generation TKIs such as osimertinib remains a major clinical challenge. As a broader strategy for combating resistance, several clinical trials have explored the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)+chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Until now, the ORIENT-31 and IMpower150 trials suggested that ICIs+ chemotherapy may be more effective than chemotherapy alone after failure of EGFR-TKIs (although ORIENT-31 was negative for overall survival [OS] and IMpower150 was a subset analysis, so the study was not powered to detect a difference); however, the CheckMate-722 trial yielded disappointing results. Thus, the results of this global trial KEYNOTE-789 were highly anticipated.
Keyphrases
- epidermal growth factor receptor
- advanced non small cell lung cancer
- clinical trial
- small cell lung cancer
- phase ii
- tyrosine kinase
- phase iii
- study protocol
- locally advanced
- open label
- brain metastases
- single cell
- squamous cell carcinoma
- randomized controlled trial
- radiation therapy
- free survival
- chemotherapy induced
- combination therapy
- placebo controlled
- chronic myeloid leukemia