Effectiveness of the Advanced Practice Nursing interventions in the patient with heart failure: A systematic review.
Javier Ordóñez-PiedraJosé Antonio Ponce-BlandónJosé Miguel Robles-RomeroJuan Gómez SalgadoNerea Jiménez PicónMacarena Romero-MartínPublished in: Nursing open (2021)
A total of 43,754 patients participated in the 11 included studies for the development of this review, mostly from United States and non-European countries, with a clearly visible lack of European publications. Regarding the results related to first PICO question, researches reviewed proved that APN implied a reduction in the number of hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure (up to 33%). Regarding the second question, mortality was always lower in groups assisted by APN versus in control groups (up to 7.8% vs. 17.7%). Regarding the third question, APN was cost-effective in this type of patient as the cost reduction was eventually calculated in 1.9 million euros. Regarding the last question, quality of life of patients who have been cared for by an APN had notoriously improved, although one of the papers concluded that no significant differences were found. All the questions addressed obtained a positive answer; therefore, APN is a practice that reduced hospital readmissions and mortality in HF patients. The cost-effectiveness is much better with APN than with usual care, and although the quality of life of HF patients seems to improve with APN, more studies are needed to support this focused on this.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- heart failure
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- primary care
- prognostic factors
- type diabetes
- mental health
- randomized controlled trial
- physical activity
- peritoneal dialysis
- emergency department
- systematic review
- risk factors
- patient reported outcomes
- health insurance
- case report
- chronic pain