Are we overlooking the rural patient journey when it comes to sepsis diagnosis and management?
Jordan KirbyPublished in: Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2021)
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines have progressively moved towards faster time-based treatment targets over recent years despite international data consistently showing low protocol adherence. A key stakeholder in Australian healthcare remains overlooked in sepsis research: the under-resourced rural ED. The journey of the rural patient markedly differs to that of the metropolitan patient, involving greater reliance upon patient transfers, reduced staffing and resource inaccessibility, directly impacting on sepsis protocol adherence and patient outcomes. Greater representation of rural patients and EDs in Australian sepsis research is paramount in guiding future sepsis treatment protocols. This perspective piece explores current international sepsis literature, recognising significant barriers to sepsis protocol adherence specific to rural Australian EDs.
Keyphrases
- septic shock
- acute kidney injury
- intensive care unit
- south africa
- healthcare
- case report
- randomized controlled trial
- emergency department
- systematic review
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- machine learning
- type diabetes
- newly diagnosed
- metabolic syndrome
- electronic health record
- skeletal muscle
- adipose tissue
- peritoneal dialysis
- clinical practice
- big data
- combination therapy
- patient reported