The use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed.
Keyphrases
- computed tomography
- healthcare
- primary care
- quality improvement
- positron emission tomography
- clinical practice
- physical activity
- cross sectional
- electronic health record
- dual energy
- machine learning
- hip fracture
- emergency department
- combination therapy
- wastewater treatment
- young adults
- contrast enhanced
- total hip
- total knee arthroplasty
- sensitive detection
- adverse drug
- health insurance