Login / Signup

Polytomous Rasch Analyses of Surgeons' Decision-Making on Choice of Procedure in Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgeries.

Kai-Uwe LewandrowskiRossano Kepler Alvim FiorelliMauricio G PereiraIvo AbrahamHeber Humberto Alfaro PachicanoJohn C ElfarAbduljabbar AlhammoudStefan LandgraeberJoachim OertelStefan HellingerÁlvaro DowlingPaulo Sérgio Teixeira De CarvalhoMax Rogerio Freitas RamosHelton Luiz Aparecido DefinoJoão Paulo Machado BergamaschiNicola MontemurroChristopher YeungMarcelo BritoDouglas P BeallGerd IvanicZhang XifengZhen-Zhou LiJin-Sung L KimJorge F RamirezMorgan P Lorio
Published in: International journal of spine surgery (2024)
Surgeon decision-making in selecting patients for endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis is multifaceted. While the framework of clinical guidelines remains paramount, on-the-ground experience-based factors significantly influence surgeons' selection of patients for endoscopic lumbar spinal stenosis surgeries. The Rasch methodology allows for a more granular psychometric evaluation of surgeon decision-making and accounts better for years-long experience that may be lost in standardized clinical guideline development. This new approach to assessing spine surgeons' thought processes may improve the implementation of evidence-based protocol change dictated by technological advances was endorsed by the Interamerican Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SICCMI), the International Society for Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery (ISMISS), the Mexican Spine Society (AMCICO), the Brazilian Spine Society (SBC), the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS), the Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Society (KOMISS), and the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS).
Keyphrases