Login / Signup

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Lei HuXiangyu GuoDa-Wei ZhouZhen WangLisong DaiLiang LiTian ZhangHaining LongChengxin YuZhen-Wei ShiChu HanCheng LuJun Gong ZhaoYuehua LiYun-Fei ZhaZaiyi Liu
Published in: Radiology. Artificial intelligence (2024)
"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence . This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content . Purpose To develop an MRI-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis that can resist rectal artifact interference. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2203 male patients with prostate lesions who underwent biparametric MRI and biopsy between January 2019 and June 2023. A targeted adversarial training with proprietary adversarial samples (TPAS) strategy was proposed to enhance model resistance against rectal artifacts. The automated csPCa diagnostic models trained with and without TPAS were compared using multicenter validation datasets. The impact of rectal artifacts on diagnostic performance of each model at the patient and lesion levels was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The AUC between models was compared using the Delong test, and the AUPRC was compared using the bootstrap method. Results The TPAS model exhibited diagnostic performance improvements of 6% at the patient level (AUC: 0.87 versus 0.81; P < .001) and 7% at the lesion level (AUPRC: 0.84 versus 0.77; P = .007) compared with the control model. The TPAS model demonstrated less performance decline in the presence of rectal artifact-pattern adversarial noise than the control model (ΔAUC: -17% versus -19%; ΔAUPRC: -18% versus -21%). The TPAS model performed better than the control model in patients with moderate (AUC: 0.79 versus 0.73; AUPRC: 0.68 versus 0.61), and severe (AUC: 0.75 versus 0.57; AUPRC: 0.69 versus 0.59) artifacts. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the TPAS model can reduce rectal artifact interference in MRI-based PCa diagnosis, thereby improving its performance in clinical applications. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Keyphrases