Robotic and laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study and economic evaluation in England.
Andrew McCarthyDilupa SamarakoonJoanne GrayPeter McmeekinStephen McCarthyClaire NewtonMarielle NobbenhuisJonathan LippiattJeremy TwiggPublished in: BMJ open (2023)
Findings suggest that RALS versus CLS in women undergoing hysterectomy (after adjusting for differences in morbidity) is cost-effective with lower costs and QALYs. Results are highly sensitive to the usage of robotic hardware with higher usage increasing the probability of cost-effectiveness. Non-inferiority randomised controlled trial would be of benefit to decision-makers to provide further evidence on the cost-effectiveness of RALS versus CLS but may not be practical due to surgical preferences of surgeons and the extensive roll out of RALS.