Login / Signup

Public attitudes towards protecting the human rights of people with mental illness: a scoping review and data from a population trend study in Germany.

Georg SchomerusChristian SandersStephanie SchindlerEva BaumannMatthias C Angermeyer
Published in: International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) (2022)
The human rights of people with mental illness are constantly threatened. We conduct a scoping review showing how public attitudes towards protecting human rights have so far been examined and providing an overview of our present knowledge of these attitudes, and present novel findings from a trend study in Germany over nine years, reporting attitudes elicited in 2020 and examining whether these attitudes have changed since 2011. Few studies address attitudes towards human rights explicitly, but several studies contain single items on either first generation human rights, mainly concerning involuntary admission, or civil liberties like the right to vote, or second generation human rights, mainly with regard to funding for healthcare, but also for example regarding career choice. Recent data from Germany showed little improvement in attitudes towards protecting human rights over the last decade and particularly high support for restricting job opportunities for people with mental illness. Although generally, most restrictions were supported by a minority of respondents only, both our data and our scoping review indicate substantial support for several restrictions in several countries, showing that public attitudes pose a challenge to the human rights of persons with mental illness. We discuss possible lines of future research.
Keyphrases
  • mental illness
  • endothelial cells
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • emergency department
  • machine learning
  • decision making
  • current status