Login / Signup

Treatment evaluation for a data-driven subgroup in adaptive enrichment designs of clinical trials.

Zhiwei ZhangRuizhe ChenGuoxing SoonHui Zhang
Published in: Statistics in medicine (2017)
Adaptive enrichment designs (AEDs) of clinical trials allow investigators to restrict enrollment to a promising subgroup based on an interim analysis. Most of the existing AEDs deal with a small number of predefined subgroups, which are often unknown at the design stage. The newly developed Simon design offers a great deal of flexibility in subgroup selection (without requiring pre-defined subgroups) but does not provide a procedure for estimating and testing treatment efficacy for the selected subgroup. This article proposes a 2-stage AED which does not require predefined subgroups but requires a prespecified algorithm for choosing a subgroup on the basis of baseline covariate information. Having a prespecified algorithm for subgroup selection makes it possible to use cross-validation and bootstrap methods to correct for the resubstitution bias in estimating treatment efficacy for the selected subgroup. The methods are evaluated and compared in a simulation study mimicking actual clinical trials of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Keyphrases
  • clinical trial
  • phase iii
  • machine learning
  • endothelial cells
  • healthcare
  • phase ii
  • replacement therapy
  • double blind
  • social media
  • study protocol
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • data analysis
  • induced pluripotent stem cells