Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews.
Ingrid Eshun-WilsonShahista JafferRhodine SmithSamuel JohnsonPaul HineAlberto MateoAnne-Marie StephaniPaul GarnerPublished in: Systematic reviews (2019)
We suggest that authors clearly characterize interventions and synthesis approaches in their review protocols. In research fields, such as HIV, where questions change frequently, systematic reviews and protocols should be regularly re-evaluated to ensure relevance to current questions. This process of re-evaluation should be incorporated into the methods of living systematic reviews.