Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Visceral Pain Originating from the Pelvic and Abdominal Region: A Narrative Review on a Possible New Indication for Patients with Therapy-Resistant Pain.
Matthanja BiezeAnnelotte Pauline van HaapsLeonardo KapuralSean LiKris FergusonRalph de VriesMichael E SchatmanVelja MijatovicJan Willem KallewaardPublished in: Journal of pain research (2024)
Better screening and selection criteria need to be established to optimally evaluate eligible patients who might benefit from SCS. A positive outcome of a sympathetic nerve block appears to be a potential indicator of SCS effectiveness. Additionally, women receiving SCS for endometriosis had a better outcome compared to other indications. Finally, SCS could also relief functional symptoms such as voiding problems and gastroparesis. Complications could often be resolved with revision surgery. Since SCS is expensive and not always covered by standard health insurance, the incorporation of cost-analyses is recommended. In order to establish a comprehensive treatment plan, including selection criteria for SCS, rigorous prospective, possibly randomized and controlled studies that are diagnosis-oriented, with substantial follow-up and adequate sample sizes, are needed.
Keyphrases
- health insurance
- spinal cord
- chronic pain
- neuropathic pain
- pain management
- minimally invasive
- systematic review
- randomized controlled trial
- mental health
- total knee arthroplasty
- double blind
- healthcare
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- pregnant women
- depressive symptoms
- clinical trial
- coronary artery bypass
- acute coronary syndrome
- climate change
- adipose tissue
- skeletal muscle
- phase iii
- replacement therapy
- case control
- pregnancy outcomes